A single combined score is reported because it is more reliable than either task score alone although the GRE ® Analytical Writing measure contains two discrete analytical writing tasks. The score reported will represent the average associated with scores when it comes to two tasks.

Score of 6 Outstanding

A 6 paper presents a cogent, well-articulated critique of this argument and conveys meaning skillfully.

A typical paper in this category:

  • clearly identifies important attributes of the argument and analyzes them insightfully
  • develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically and connects all of them with clear transitions
  • effectively supports the primary points regarding the critique
  • demonstrates control of language, including word that is appropriate and sentence variety
  • demonstrates facility aided by the conventions (for example., grammar, usage and mechanics) of standard written English but might have errors that are minor


Score of 5 Strong

A 5 paper presents a generally thoughtful, well-developed critique regarding the argument and conveys meaning clearly.

A paper that is typical this category:

  • clearly identifies important top features of the argument and analyzes them in a way that is generally perceptive
  • develops ideas clearly, organizes them logically and connects all of them with appropriate transitions
  • sensibly supports the key points associated with the critique
  • demonstrates control of language, including word that is appropriate and sentence variety
  • demonstrates facility utilizing the conventions of standard written English, but may have minor errors

Score of check here 4 Adequate

A 4 paper presents a critique that is competent of argument and conveys meaning adequately.

A typical paper in this category:

  • identifies and analyzes important options that come with the argument
  • develops and organizes ideas satisfactorily, but may well not connect these with transitions
  • supports the key points regarding the critique
  • Demonstrates control that is sufficient of to express ideas with reasonable clarity
  • generally demonstrates control of the conventions of standard written English, but could have some errors

Score of 3 Limited

A 3 paper demonstrates some competence in its critique associated with argument plus in conveying meaning, but is obviously flawed.

A paper that is typical this category exhibits one or more of this following characteristics:

  • will not identify or analyze most of the important top features of the argument, however some analysis of the argument is present
  • mainly analyzes tangential or irrelevant matters, or reasons poorly
  • is limited into the logical development and organization of ideas
  • Offers support of little value and relevance for points for the critique
  • lacks clarity in expressing ideas
  • contains occasional major errors or frequent minor errors in grammar, usage or mechanics that may interfere with meaning

Score of 2 Seriously Flawed

A 2 paper demonstrates weaknesses that are serious analytical writing.

A paper that is typical this category exhibits one or more for the following characteristics:

  • does not present a critique centered on logical analysis, but may instead present the writer’s own views on the subject
  • Does not develop ideas or is illogical and disorganized
  • provides little if any relevant or reasonable support
  • Has problems that are serious the usage language and in sentence structure that frequently interfere with meaning
  • contains serious errors in grammar, usage or mechanics that frequently obscure meaning

Score of 1 Fundamentally Deficient

A 1 paper demonstrates fundamental deficiencies in analytical writing.

A paper that is typical this category exhibits one or more regarding the following characteristics:

  • provides little or no proof of the capability to understand and analyze the argument
  • provides little or no evidence of the ability to develop an organized response
  • has severe problems in language and sentence structure that persistently interfere with meaning
  • Contains errors that are pervasive grammar, usage or mechanics that end up in incoherence